First assumption: I have no sympathies for the Iranian government, but I am very sympathetic with Iranian culture which is strictly connected with Shiite philosophy. There’s something in common we have with them, starting from our Indo-European parentage.

Second assumption: I believe this is an illegal and wrong war which will affect us for a long time.

The world, you know, the reality of the current society, works by instability and contradictions, otherwise there would be static. In that way the US warmongers are much more in the game than others. They can imagine shape or reshape the world.

Of course, many of us don’t like American politics and don’t like war, but unfortunately they are (the USA) succeeding in reshaping the world. I mean, the final results have to be seen yet, but they tried to intervene to postpone their downfall. And they are succeeding firstly because nobody (excepting Iran, which has been unfairly drawn into this quagmire) are doing anything good for a different politics.

I mean, for example, why China or Russia didn’t put their navy ahead of Hormuz Straight saying, “stop with bullshit Trump”? I know it’s risky, but on the other hand, this war will last long and a global recession is expected, so the opposite of harmony that China is so relentlessly talking about will occur. So: in this case the role of China is not for stabilization. Playing no role is collaborating with the aggressors.

I can lightly add that nature and its laws work in instability, enforcing existing and the creation of new forms of life. So, dynamic is working better than static or, if you prefer, it’s on the line of real life. In fact, if even a mild intervention of the two powers mentioned above occurred, there would have been a dynamic in the process, so in a coherent natural and better working way.